<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Open Source Security Issues Exist: Deal With Them, Report Urges	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.technewsworld.com/story/open-source-security-issues-exist-deal-with-them-report-urges-86729.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.technewsworld.com/story/open-source-security-issues-exist-deal-with-them-report-urges-86729.html?rss=1</link>
	<description>All Tech - All The Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: imagtek		</title>
		<link>https://www.technewsworld.com/story/open-source-security-issues-exist-deal-with-them-report-urges-86729.html#comment-7600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imagtek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technewsworld.uatevtest.com/story/open-source-security-issues-exist-deal-with-them-report-urges.html#comment-7600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Open Source is a great idea.&lt;br /&gt;But the GNU GPL, a major license used by open-source, is legally enforced Communism at best, and intellectual slavery at worst.&lt;br /&gt;I never see any mention of how anyone is supposed to earn a living in open-source development.&lt;br /&gt;Implied is that they are on the payroll of a large corporation that has some undisclosed business model by which they make money with open-source software.&lt;br /&gt;Presumably, this is outfits like Amazon, IBM, Facebook, etc. that let intellectual slaves write the software they then refine and use to drive their for-profit enterprises.&lt;br /&gt;So how does this benefit anyone but monopolist corporations?&lt;br /&gt;Open-source is looking like smoke-and mirrors at this point.&lt;br /&gt;Frankly, it looks like a swindle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Source is a great idea.<br />
<br />But the GNU GPL, a major license used by open-source, is legally enforced Communism at best, and intellectual slavery at worst.<br />
<br />I never see any mention of how anyone is supposed to earn a living in open-source development.<br />
<br />Implied is that they are on the payroll of a large corporation that has some undisclosed business model by which they make money with open-source software.<br />
<br />Presumably, this is outfits like Amazon, IBM, Facebook, etc. that let intellectual slaves write the software they then refine and use to drive their for-profit enterprises.<br />
<br />So how does this benefit anyone but monopolist corporations?<br />
<br />Open-source is looking like smoke-and mirrors at this point.<br />
<br />Frankly, it looks like a swindle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
